• Welcome to realmuscleforum.com

    • 5x5 > 3x5 for mass?

    Discussion in 'Training' started by suighja, May 15, 2012.

    What are you working towards? Join Real Muscle Forum to ask questions, share your progress and discuss training with other members.
    Join the Forum Recent Discussions
    Page 2 of 2
      May 15, 2012
    1. remstation

      remstation Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 2011
      Posts:
      39,968
      Likes Received:
      0
      5x5 > 3x5 for mass?

      Regardless of what he means, it doesn't matter, same thing.
       
      remstation, May 15, 2012
      remstation, May 15, 2012
      #11
      2. May 15, 2012
    2. remstation

      remstation Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 2011
      Posts:
      39,968
      Likes Received:
      0
      5x5 > 3x5 for mass?

      i just logged back in to correct dis...lol
       
      remstation, May 15, 2012
      remstation, May 15, 2012
      #12
      3. May 15, 2012
    3. Canellesao

      Canellesao Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 2011
      Posts:
      36,073
      Likes Received:
      0
      5x5 > 3x5 for mass?

      not, really. 10 sets of 3 would be a little different
       
      Canellesao, May 15, 2012
      Canellesao, May 15, 2012
      #13
      4. May 15, 2012
    4. remstation

      remstation Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 2011
      Posts:
      39,968
      Likes Received:
      0
      5x5 > 3x5 for mass?

      The large volume will almost always generate more muscle mass, to my knowledge. However, there's a limit where it becomes counter productive, so don't assume 60 sets=60x bigger.
       
      remstation, May 15, 2012
      remstation, May 15, 2012
      #14
    Page 2 of 2
    Tags:

    Share This Page

    ▲

    1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
      Accept Learn More.
      Dismiss Notice