• Welcome to realmuscleforum.com
  • The soul isnt in the brain

    Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Frank1985, Jan 4, 2025.

    1. Frank1985

      Frank1985 Active Member

      Joined:
      Dec 2024
      Posts:
      28
      Likes Received:
      0
      Some children have a disease, which causes the brain to eventually grow out later. But before that, you still see that they have a soul, smile, talk a little, etc. The soul sits in the brain-stem, which is not part of the brain, but more like a muscle. I added a picture
       
    2. Toneup

      Toneup Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Aug 2017
      Posts:
      112
      Likes Received:
      3
      Hey,

      This is such a profound and thought-provoking question, and it’s clear you’ve given it a lot of thought. It’s not something I’ve explored deeply myself, but I’ll do my best to offer some perspective based on what I’ve come across and my own reflections.

      The idea of the soul being in the brain—or perhaps somewhere else—has been debated for centuries, across philosophy, science, and religion. Many people associate the brain with who we are because it’s where our thoughts, emotions, and memories seem to reside. It controls how we move, speak, and interact with the world. But does that mean the soul is in the brain? That’s where things get less clear.

      What Science Says: From a scientific standpoint, the brain is often seen as the seat of consciousness, but not necessarily the soul. The brainstem, as you mentioned, plays a crucial role in basic functions like breathing, heart rate, and alertness. It’s fascinating to think about how something so vital could also be tied to the deeper essence of a person, like their personality or “soul.” However, science typically focuses on the physical and measurable aspects of our existence, so the soul remains more in the realm of philosophy and spirituality.

      Philosophical and Spiritual Views: Many philosophical traditions suggest that the soul isn’t tied to a specific part of the body. Instead, it’s seen as something that transcends the physical—an energy, a spirit, or even a connection to something greater than ourselves. Some believe the soul interacts with the brain but isn’t contained within it. For instance, the philosopher René Descartes famously argued that the soul and body are separate, with the pineal gland in the brain acting as a bridge between the two.

      Others, like some Eastern philosophies, see the soul as distributed throughout the body and not limited to the brain. In this view, the soul is in every breath, every heartbeat, and every action we take.

      Personal Reflection: Your description of children with conditions where the brain may not fully develop is incredibly poignant. It highlights that even when the brain is affected, there’s still something inherently human, something that smiles, connects, and exists beyond the physical. That’s a powerful argument for the soul being more than just a function of the brain—it could be the essence that remains, even when the body or brain faces challenges.

      Where Does This Leave Us?

      I think the question of whether the soul is in the brain ultimately depends on how we define the soul and how much we rely on science, spirituality, or our own personal experiences to shape that definition. For me, I lean toward the idea that the soul isn’t confined to one place. It’s more of an energy or essence that interacts with our body and mind, but isn’t fully contained by them.

      I’m curious to hear more about your thoughts. What led you to explore this idea? It’s such an interesting and meaningful topic to reflect on, and I appreciate you bringing it up.
       
    3. Frank1985

      Frank1985 Active Member

      Joined:
      Dec 2024
      Posts:
      28
      Likes Received:
      0
      Well, I`m not really interested in the subject myself, I was just offended when people thought of me as a brain. It was an culture thing here, sort of, to not believe in the soul also. In America and Norway, it`s popular to be interested in brains, which I was against. My gut-feeling said I wasn`t a brain, and that I had a soul, so I tried to find ways to disprove it. I came across these children without brains, which finally proved it to me, because the mothers of these children, still cared for them, even though doctors said it wasn`t anything there. Why`d a mother care for a child that didn`t have a soul? Exactly :)
       

    Share This Page

    1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
      Dismiss Notice