The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

In the light of these studies I think I won't be using Boldenone anymore.
Was not a big fan of it in the first place anyways.

Deterioration of glomerular endothelial surf... [Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011] - PubMed - NCBI

p53 and Bcl-2expression in response to bo... [Toxicol Ind Health. 2011] - PubMed - NCBI

Boldenone may damage liver, says animal study

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

that study didnt prove shit bro..anyway,if your going to use u cant worry about side efects and short term and long term effects ...If anyone is so concern about anabolic side effects then they have no bussiness taking them...steroids is not a dooms day drug....And dont beleive every study u read..most are monkey shit ..just out to scare ya....dw

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

BrotherIron, Halo

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

Read the first study, calling bullshit on it. Going by the dose and the animals weight that would be the same as a 210 pound man taking 476.25 mg for 9 weeks. I personally don't know any bodybuilder who takes that little for so short of a time. Most I know including myself take 600mg or more for 14 weeks, or more. If the study held true for humans you would see bodybuilders dropping like flies. You don't.

I have to agree with DW on this one.

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

The only down i find about equipose is my blood gets real thick....i take 80mgs of asprin to keep my blood thin....Thick blood can lead to blood clots and heart attacks...Other then that equipose is about the safest steroid in the anabolic family.Just my oppion of course...dw

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

IronInsanity, ozzy69

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

I'm not a rabbit and anatomically have very little in common with one. Animal studies can be interesting but I wouldn't just take them as human applicable. Especially those which have not been replicated.

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

most study and findings generally cater to who provided the funding to do the tests

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

What he said.

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deadweight For This Useful Post:

Aren't there a group of proven "ones" that people stick too? It seems like the choices have become bigger than the menu at the Cheesecake Factory. Isn't sticking to the proven winners the safest bet?